THIS presentation is the result of my inquiry into the "terrorist attacks" of March 15, 2019, in Christchurch, New Zealand. The page will be updated whenever new material comes to hand, or whenever old material is discounted. I will, however, retain most abandoned theories, as even misconceptions have something to tell us. As I said when I first addressed the issue of the "shootings", I am doing this because I do not trust the New Zealand Government to tell us the truth. The Government's prime aim is to control the narrative, and to silence dissent with threats of savage punishment (See Footnote). If it is now dismayed by all the speculation surrounding the Christchurch events, it has only itself to blame. Secrecy creates a vacuum that speculation will always fill. That's because human beings have an irrepressible desire — and, indeed, a duty — to search and understand. The original website was constructed in April 2019, and was last updated on April 16, 2024. A pdf copy of this page, as it was on December 2, 2019, is here. The last capture by WaybackMachine, on December 14, 2022, is here.
|
In the wake of Christchurch, whitey is the new bête noire — lower than even a cockroach. Needless to say, this is hate speech. It's also incitement. But it's acceptable in the emerging imperium, because it comes from the liberal Left.
The past few years have been the most divisive in Western society since the Reformation of the 16th century, even as the banner of "inclusivity" has been hoisted higher and higher. Also noticeable, in this era of "identity politics", is the insidious erosion of middle ground, which has driven even the dispassionate observer to one extreme or the other.
|
Poor whitey! As the iniquity of the fathers is visited upon the sons, he must forever cry "mea culpa". And doubly cursed is he who also carries the burden of "toxic masculinity". He had better go, cap in hand, and seek admission to the "rainbow community".
So what was the purpose of this subterfuge? The answer, this website suggests, is the same as it was at the time of the incident's precursors — the terrorist attacks of Operation Gladio between the 1950s and 1980s: To maintain a "strategy of tension" and to make people amenable to the loss of their civil liberties.
|
The link — albeit oblique — to the Balkan wars of the 1990s is not as surprising as it might seem (see below). The take-home message from the conflict in the former Yugoslavia was "Muslim Bosniak/Kosovar=Good; Christian Serb=Bad", which is similar to the take-home message of Christchurch, after decades of denigration of Islam in New Zealand. Thus, the Christchurch event was a cultural-political coup — a radical reversal of precedent — as much as it was a "terrorist attack". Incongruously, it has also seen local Muslims embrace the wishy-washy gospel of John Lennon: "All you need is love." See the cover of Woman's Weekly, April 1, 2019.
Веза – иако посредно – са ратовима на Балкану 1990-их (види испод) није тако изненађујућа како се чини. Порука за понети из сукоба у бившој Југославији је била „Муслимани Босанци/Косовари=Добри; Хришћански Срби=Лоши“, што је слично поруци за понети из Крајстерча, након деценија клеветанја Ислама на Новом Зеланду. Према томе Крајстчерч је чак био културно-политички државни удар – радикално поништаванје преседана – колико је и био „терористички напад“. Непосредно, такође је виђено како локални Муслимани невољно прихватају јеванђеље Џона Ленона: „Све што вам треба је љубав.“ Погледајте насловницу Woman's Weekly-ја.
Don't ask for answers: Lips are sealed in the Garden CityIrecently bumped into an old acquaintance — a retired District Court judge. |
News of Nov 1, 2023: Police release Al-Noor CCTV footageIf the police have this footage, and if it's genuine, they must also have footage of the "shooter" entering Al Noor — even if, as researchers maintain, the "live stream" was made in advance of March 15, 2019, and edited before being released. The screenshot shows paramedics being escorted into the mosque on March 15.
|
Official narrative flies in the face of core Islamic practiceWhile searching for anomalies in the official narrative of March 15, it's easy to overlook the violations of Islamic practice in the presentation of the drama. So let's put aside the issues of timelines, weapons, ballistics, etc., and examine the story from the perspective of the Sunnah:
Left: The "body" of Husna Ahmed, which was found about 20 meters from the mosque compound's side gate. Right: The "body" of Ansi Alibava, which was found in the gutter at the entrance to the alley in which the "gunman" parked his car. Earlier, while the "gunman" was exiting the mosque for the second and last time, he "fired" at two women in black who were walking through the side gate and on to the public footpath. These are, presumably, the two women pictured above, as no other women are seen in the "live stream". One wonders, therefore, why one of them is now dressed in pink. Muslim convert Nathan Smith is seen "comforting" Ansi's "body", after apparently failing to notice it no longer has a head. Needless to say, he would not have been allowed to do this after a real crime, and the police standing around (but not fully visible in this picture) would have immediately cordoned off the area. The fake blood in the gutter is from a blood squib that discharged when the alleged gunman fired at "Ansi" as she pleaded (in a dubbed-in voice), "Help me! Help me!" — while she still had a head. Finally, it should be noted that when Ansi did have a head, she was not wearing hijab — a little odd for a woman who had, one assumes, just left the masjid. Finally, if the above "Ansi" is a dummy, where is the real Ansi? |
An outline of events related to March 15 in ChristchurchAFTER each item that has a bearing on the events of March 15, I have made a comment in bold face. Throughout this presentation, I have supported my arguments with pictures from various sources, which include, ironically, the Facebook page of Al Noor Mosque. In some instances, I have placed a series of photographs, illustrating a particular person or topic, on a subsidiary page. I have also placed some less important pictures here, and some pictures of the petitions launched after the alleged attacks here.
ment of Defense (DoD) awarded a cont- ract on the 12th November 2019 to Labyrinth Global Health INC. for ‘COVID-19 Research’, at least one month before the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus, and three months before it was officially dubbed Covid-19?" Also remarkable is the way in which The Economist in 2012 appeared to foretell the Hamas paraglider attack on Israel of 2023. • Predictive programming and timeline issues are further discussed, in relation to Linwood Islamic Center, here. |
• The illustration on the left is a panel from the back cover of Chronicles of False Flag Terror, by Nick Kollerstrom, 2017, Moon Rock Books. — The counter-terrorism drill that morphs into "reality" is a striking phenomenon of the 21st century — and one that Kollerstrom describes as an intelligence test for the alert onlooker. Click
here to listen to the relevant part of the Radio 5 Live Drivetime interview, in which Peter Power, the managing director of crisis management
firm Visor Consultants, talks to Peter Allen.
• Just two more bizarre coincidences?
• Some observers, after noting that the police officers flip the above figure like a rag doll, have suggested that it is a dummy. If it isn't, why has the face been blurred? Click here to see an enlargement of the picture, in which the face is clearer, and here to read the Free Thought Project's NZ Police "Happened to Be in a Training Session When Mosque Shooting Began. There is also a video in which the presence of "global sharpshooters" in Christchurch is discussed. Meanwhile, I would like to ask my credulous reader: How many times does this "coincidence" have to occur before you finally smell a rat? When the "training exercise" runs seamlessly into the "terrorist attack", as it does in this case, does it take an IQ of 150 to see that something is not quite right? Isn't it time we all woke up to what Peter Levenda has described as "the tenuousness of consensus reality"?
The training exercise involves the local hospital. — Fact. "It's reported the officers were training on an unused floor at Princess Margaret Hospital on Friday morning. When the shooting began they were still there, but had firearms and patrol cars parked outside" (Newshub, March 21, 2019). In "Christchurch Decoded? A ‘Lone Gunman’ — or a Stealthy Coup d’État in Slow Motion?", Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards says there were two other exercises that day — "a military exercise at a Defence Force shooting range in West Melton, 25 kilometers west of the city, and a joint Air Force exercise out of RNZAF Base Woodbourne, near Blenheim". Snoopman's two-part article is here. |
Advertisements: Take America Back Flag | www.uptownfacts.com | The most popular baby names in Russia. Interestingly, some traditional russian names are popular across all the ex-Soviet republics, in particular Alexander, Sergey, Maksim and Andrey; and Anna, Olga, Sofia and Anastasia. | Advertise your great website here. | get the best preparation for indian civil service exams - visit - https://iasvision.com/ get the highest level support | CSCS was set up to help Get CONSTRUCTION CARD SCHEME ONLINE UK change of nationality. | Translate text, voice, text on picture, files, websites into 109 languages. english to spanish The translator is available on different platforms - Windows, MacOS, Android, IOS.
Hospital staff are told to expect a realistic scene, with armed police running around, ambulances coming and going, etc. — Conjecture, but in line with the known modus operandi of the perpetrators of false-flag terrorist attacks/hoaxes. Cf. the "Boston bombing" and the "Parkland school shooting".
|
Tarrant is NOT a racist. — Conjecture, but a reasonable assumption in view of his wide travels and praise for Pakistan and its people. If he is a racist, he is idiosyncratic in this respect. Anyone reading his comments about Pakistan must wonder: Is this the person who seethes with disgust at the sight of Pakistani "invaders" in Europe? Gordon Duff describes him as a sociopath, i.e. a person who lacks empathy. But how does that description square with his evident appreciation of kind-heartedness? In my opinion, Tarrant is probably little more than an (expendable) operative like Lee Harvey Oswald.
|
Real and faked: The various faces of Brenton Tarrant
Tarrant could not have been made to look more menacing. One is reminded of how pictures of Lee Harvey Oswald were doctored to make him look rattish. Note, too, how the alleged killer is invariably representative of a target population group. Oswald was a "Communist". Sirhan Sirhan, the alleged assassin of RFK, was a Palestinian. Other killers have been representative of "radical Islam", and have helpfully emphasized their identity by shouting "Allahu akbar".
The initial blurring of Tarrant's face opened the door to speculation, and to at least one spurious representation of him — as American comedian Sam Hyde (see below right). Apparently, Hyde's head is often grafted on to the bodies of criminals.
Yet another face is the face in the rear-view mirror as "Tarrant" turns into the alley beside Al Noor Mosque, after almost missing the turn indicated by the presence of "pit-stop man" - a figure wearing a red jumpsuit (see below).
Mystery of the "mosque shooter's" idle minute explainedAs we have seen, "Tarrant" breaks his drive to Al Noor Mosque when he suddenly parks beside the road for no discernible reason. Then, after exactly one minute, a person in red walks past his car. Ten seconds later, "Tarrant" drives off. Some investigators say this person in red is "Tarrant's" handler (or one of his handlers). The person's red clothing signals, "Everything is on schedule. It's okay to proceed". Investigators have also noted the presence of red cars parked along Tarrant's route, including one that is parked immediately outside the mosque, and have theorized that these are "markers". The final okay for the mission comes after "Tarrant" parks in the alley beside the mosque, facing the road. A man in a white shirt and dark trousers walks past the alley, turns slightly, and gives a thumbs-up signal. — An alternative explanation, which I think is less plausible, is that the man is simply acknowledging "Tarrant's" presence. |
A figure in red walks past the car at 4.08. Figures in red were also used as markers during the Melbourne car attack of
January 20, 2017.
One investigator who fully appreciates the significance of the "red markers" is Kurt Haskell, the American lawyer who revealed that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (the "Underwear Bomber") was allowed to board Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam on December 25, 2009, without a passport. Another such investigator, who says he has also conducted a frame-by-frame analysis of what purports to be the shooter's live-stream, is Max Igan — an Australian activist who fled to Mexico in 2021. "This was not a lone wolf shooting by a white supremacist," he writes. "This was an organized hit using multiple players as clearly seen and evidenced by the shooter's own video. Jacinda Ardern is a liar and the people of New Zealand are being disarmed under false pretenses — and it's happening so fast because the Government is terrified of what will happen if the people find out . . . People simply do not realize how well they have been prepped for this event." But unlike Haskell — and, indeed, all other impartial investigators — Igan believes the "shooting" is real, and that people actually died. — I think Haskell's analysis is sounder than Igan's. I don't think anyone died, or was even wounded, in the "shooting" shown in the "live stream". But as I said above, I think it's possible that people died or (more likely) disappeared in the days leading up to March 15, 2019. (For other possibilities, see my old intro at chchtruth.com/oldintro.) I have occasionally read that Daoud Nabi — widely described as the "mosque greeter" — died of natural causes some days before 3/15, and was posthumously "assigned" to the role of "greeter". I have no opinion on this claim. There is more info about Nabi at kufr.club. |
His task complete, "pit-stop man" walks off into the sunset. The alleged shooter enters the alley beside the mosque, and in-
advertently gives us a glimpse of his face in the rear-view mirror. Is this the face of Brenton Tarrant?
The singer, Zeljko Grmusa, has said he "feels threatened", and that he wonders whether the police "will now knock on my door". He says he still sings, but mainly at social celebrations. |
According to some commentators, the words of this song, popularly known as "Remove Kebab", constitute "hate speech". But assuming the translation from Serbian is accurate, there is nothing more sinister in it than a warning that the Ustaše (Croatian nationalist organization) and "Turks" (presumably the Bosnian Muslims) should "watch out". During World War I, when Serbia was on "our" side, it was portrayed as "plucky little Serbia", an outpost of Western civilization. But since the Balkan wars of the 1990s, it has been depicted as a hotbed of genocidal maniacs. That prejudice — and the fact that Tarrant played the song while driving to Al Noor Mosque — is why it was banned by YouTube for a while. Above is the original version.
|
Click here to return to the previous mention of Serbia Strong. Then continue to scroll down.
After the martial overture, the drama of the century begins...And in the words of Mohamed Jama himself, speaking as Abdul-Aziz, of Linwood Islamic Center fame, works his phone in the background: The only problem is that the "live stream" of the "attack" on Al Noor Mosque clearly shows that there was no interaction between Jama and the "gunman", and that no shot was fired at Jama or in his vicinity.
There are only two other people who are not fired at by the "gunman" during the "shooting" at Al Noor. One is "Thumbs-Up Man" (below left), who is now seen walking towards the rear of the mosque at 6:33. The other is the unknown person (below right) sitting in the silver car, registration FQH875, to the left of the mosque entrance, at 8:49. This is the car that drives off while the "gunman" is returning to the mosque after his trip back to his vehicle. As the silver car enters the road, it knocks over the traffic cone that was placed there. — It is possible to speculate that all three people (or four people, if one includes the unidentified woman) are either accomplices or people who are in on the hoax. If "Thumbs-Up Man" is not an accomplice — if he is just an innocent member of the public — what is he doing wandering around to the rear of the mosque? If, on the other hand, he is an ordinary Muslim, we have to classify him as yet another "late arrival" — and one who is oddly off course. • Watch the video of the car's mysterious disappearance. • View more pictures of the car on the dedicated page. |
Where are Wasseim Alsati and his daughter Alen?"The last thing Christchurch mosque shooting survivor Wasseim Alsati remembers before he lost consciousness is his daughter's tiny belly covered in blood. The New Zealand barber had a rare morning off on March 15, and he decided to spend it with his then-four-year-old girl Alen Daraghmih and take her to mosque with him. 'That was her first time in life to come with me to the mosque,' Alsati told As It Happens host Carol Off. But before they even got inside Al Noor, both father and daughter were shot and left for dead. Bystanders found them and drove them to hospital." — CBC Radio, April 15, 2019. See a radically different story here. They are nowhere to be seen as the 'gunman' comes and goes during 'attack'Note that the silver car, shown to the right of the mosque's entrance in "First exit", is no longer there in "Second exit". It disappeared while the "gunman" was making his second entry to the mosque compound via the subsidiary gate to the left of the main gate (looking from the road). That's why his perspective is different as he approaches the mosque's entrance for the second time. One suspects the "gunman" was instructed to use the subsidiary gate for his second entry to avoid an embarrassing meeting between him and the car on its way out. • But where, exactly, were Wasseim and Alen when they were allegedly shot? The above four pictures, taken from the alleged gunman's "live stream", show us what he saw as he entered and exited the mosque during his alleged shooting spree. And the father and daughter are nowhere to be seen in the immediate vicinity of the mosque during any of the "gunman's" comings and goings. In addition, the "live stream" shows that they were not, at any stage of the "shooting", on the public footpath outside the mosque. The only people the "gunman" encounters on the footpath are Mohamed Jama and the unidentified woman (see above). Furthermore, there are no "bystanders" anywhere near the mosque to mount a rescue operation. The colorful reports of wounded people/dead bodies lying all over the place, and being scooped up and rushed to hospital by Good Samaritans, are the inventions of scriptwriters and false witnesses. When the "gunman" eventually drives off, he leaves only two "bodies" — purportedly those of Ansi Alibava and Husna Ahmed (also see above). The picture on the right was reportedly taken on April 26, 2019, during what was described at the time as a visit by Prince William to Starship Children's Hospital in Auckland. It shows Wasseim sitting beside Alen, who looks remarkably well for someone who was reportedly flown to Auckland on March 15 with life-threatening injuries. She is also lucid enough — despite her reported brain damage — to ask William about his family. — I have heard a recording of a telephone conversation in which a person, apparently at Starship Hospital, says the hospital has no record of Alen being admitted. The information I have, which comes largely from Greg Hallett, is that Alen was admitted to Christchurch Hospital on March 15 and discharged at 4.20am on March 16. Meanwhile, her father was apparently admitted to Christchurch Hospital on March 15 and discharged at 6.40pm on March 17. My understanding is that, on March 15, he was working as a barber and did not go to the mosque at any time. According to Hallett, Alsati is also a Jordanian agent. At this stage, I can't confirm any of these claims. |
Adeeb Sami case: Glaring inconsistencies go unquestionedThere is a mention of Adeeb Sami — the jackass who couldn't stop laughing — in the introductory paragraphs above. Click here to view the video, if you missed it above. The Gulf businessman has a page dedicated to him here.In the above interview, Ali appears to have completely forgotten his script — the story he was supposed to tell about his father saving his life by "taking a bullet" for him. He is not a good liar. His body language is appalling. He gives every sign of feeling extremely uncomfortable, despite the reassuring smiles of other family members, including his mother, during the interview. Needless to say, he would not have forgotten this story if it had been true. It simply isn't possible for a person to forget such a profoundly moving experience. Interestingly, his older brother, Abdullah, has had nothing to say. • To read the above articles about Adeeb Sami, click on the respective images. |
'Attack' Part 1: Anomalies from the mosque's hallwayPicture No 1: The body in the entrance shows no sign of injury, despite supposedly having been hit by a shotgun blast only seconds earlier. The clothes have been pulled up over the face, presumably to prevent identification. According to the most popular version of the official narrative, the only person standing in the doorway was Daoud Nabi — he who greeted the "gunman" with the immortal words, "Hello, brother" (or "Welcome, brother"). Picture No 2: When the "gunman" enters the mosque, there is already an ammunition magazine on the floor in the hallway. This was presumably left there by accident, after a previous take of the video. Later, the "gunman" picks it up and clips it on to his weapon. Picture No 3: As the gunman advances, he "fires" at a man crawling up the hallway. The man clearly has bare feet at this stage. Picture No 4: As the "gunman" walks down the hallway, at the end of his first "shooting" spree, he passes the man on the floor, who now has blue socks on. Several analysts have noticed that the crisis actors involved in this "production" are not good at holding positions, and sometimes make small changes in the interests of comfort. • The design of the carpet points in the direction of Makkah (Mecca). |
'Attack' Part 2: Anomalies from the prayer hall 'shooting'As the "gunman" enters the prayer hall, he initially turns to the left (see inset) — but not far enough to reveal the pre-positioned heap of "bodies" in the near corner. He then turns to the right, where there is another heap of pre-positioned "bodies" in the corresponding corner. There are also two standing men, one facing the back wall of the prayer hall (and thus away from the Qibla or direction of Makkah) and the other facing the front wall of the women's room (in which no women are seen). It's hard to tell what these two men are supposed to be doing, though I speculate above, in the section on Islamic practice, that the first man could be praying, albeit irregularly. The first man is sometimes referred to as "Invincible Man", as the "shots" fired at him appear to have no effect. He turns slightly to his left and strolls away.Picture No 1: This is the moment, at 8:33, when the gunman picks up the ammunition magazine mentioned above, clips it to his gun, and exits the mosque for the first time. Before doing this, he makes two excursions from the musallā into the hallway to reload. (His reason for reloading in the hallway is not clear.) Picture No 2: At 10:59, after reentering the mosque, the "gunman" fires at close range into the heap of "bodies" in the corner to the right of the doorway. But a "shot" aimed at a "worshiper" wearing a white kufi (prayer cap) does nothing more than send the kufi flying — confirming that the "weapon" used is actually a replica airgun. See gif of action. Picture No 3: As the "gunman's" GoPro camera pans around the prayer hall, it traverses the minbar (pulpit) several times, showing with reasonable clarity that there is no one hiding in it — contrary to the assertion of imam Gamal Fouda that he ducked down at the outset of the "shooting", and observed everything that transpired. |
'Attack' Part 3: Anomalies from after the 'gunman' leavesThe above screenshot is from 8:58, when the "gunman" has left the mosque for the first time. See a gif of the action. After "firing" up and down the road at nothing discernible, he returns to his car, throws his gun to the ground, and takes the remaining gun from the already-open trunk. (Yes, it remains open during his first foray into the mosque.) He then heads back to the mosque, which he reenters via the subsidiary gate to the left of the main gate — as already noted. In response to the above evidence, Max Igan has commented: "The claims of hoax and CGI are damage control. People are being played, and if they cannot get a bit of focus, learn to think for themselves and start reporting some real truth regarding this shooting, we are going to get totally screwed over this event. When properly examined, all evidence in the actual shooter's video suggests that this shooting was real, and claiming it's fake is one of the things that is going to be used to shut us all down."
In falso-flag terror events, fake bloodstains are often added to white clothing for the sake of effect. Click here for a video analysis of the top heap of "bodies", in which a real person raises a hand to shield his face from the blast of air. There is also a hand that moves in the bottom heap of bodies, seemingly to provide comfort or reassurance. See here. The mysterious case of the dummy in the gutter that later loses its headPicture No 1:This is purportedly the body of Indian student Ansi Alibava — one of the two women in black "shot" by the gunman as they exited the mosque compound via the side gate. A voice is heard pleading, "Help me! Help me!" as the "gunman" approaches the "body", which is lying in the gutter in front of the entrance to the alley in which he has parked his car. Note the awkwardly crossed legs, with the feet facing away from each other. Note, too, that someone has removed the shoes and placed them beside the body. This is reminiscent of the Masonic Rite of Discalceation, and is often seen at the scenes of false-flag terrorist attacks. It could thus be viewed as the "calling card" of the real perpetrators, albeit an esoteric one. Picture No 2: At 12:07 the "gunman" fires the first of two "shots" at the "body", directly or indirectly causing a blood squib in the right sleeve to discharge. Picture No 3: The "gunman" fires the second "shot", making the hair fly and apparently dislodging some of it. • Nathan Smith is des- cribed in a BBC article of March 20, 2019, as a "father of three, originally from Poole in Dorset". Smith is quoted as saying that, after he escaped from the mosque, he found a young woman lying in the road beside the mosque. "I can see she's been shot so I crouch down and try to roll her over...I didn't know her name and I don't know where she's from at the time. I'm just holding her, I don't know why but I'm stroking her back — she's already dead." If Ansi is dead, how did she really die? If she is alive, what is in the coffin in the picture below? The picture to the left was found on the Facebook page of Al Noor Mosque shortly after March 15, 2019. Crisis actors congregate in the alley, where they receive instructions from a police handler. Meanwhile, the "body" — purportedly that of Ansi Alibava — lies where it was "shot", totally ignored for the time being. This defilement of the area is further evidence that this is not a real crime scene. The photographer was Mark Baker, AP Southeast Asia photo editor, who just happened to be in Christchurch at the time. See the video below. The crisis actors continue to mill around, chatting or working their phones. They look like commuters waiting for a bus to arrive. The man with the ID tag, who appears to be lost in thought, is probably an operation manager. The man in the yellow kufi (prayer hat) to the right is Al Noor imam Gamal Fouda, a former Egyptian primary school teacher. Crisis actors regroup in Hagley Park for further instructions from policeAl Noor imam Gamal Fouda raises a pensive finger to his mouth (center right, wearing a blue robe), while a police handler tells the crisis actors what they have to do next. Everyone remains completely unemotional.This puts everything into perspective. Al Noor Mosque is in the background; the alley, where the "body" of Ansi Alibava was found, is in the near distance; and closest to the camera is a red "X", where the "body" of Husna Ahmed was found. As pointed out elsewhere, the latter has to be the "body" of Husna because she is the only other alleged female fatality at Al Noor. Remember, too, that the official narrative has Husna being shot on entering the mosque to search for her husband. |
|
The mystery of the windshield undamaged by three shots fired through itAfter the "gunman" drives away from Al Noor Mosque, ostensibly in the direction of Linwood Islamic Center, he fires three shots through the windshield of his car, apparently without damaging the glass. He then fires through the side window to his left at two men walking through the carpark of the Argyle Motel on Deans Avenue. (These are the Muslims who are described as "running late" for the Salat al-Jumu'ah or Friday Prayer.) In this instance, the glass is shattered. Above, in a screenshot from CCTV footage from the Argyle Motel, a man flees as he comes under fire from the "gunman's" car. In this footage, the "gunman" sounds his car horn. But in the "live stream" of the attacks, the horn is not sounded. Furthermore, the sound of gunfire in this video is different, being much louder and far more dramatic — like that of a fully automatic weapon. Below, the car, a Subaru Outback, is rammed by the police in Brougham Street, and then trucked away. According to the official narrative, this action occurs after the attack on Linwood Islamic Center. The above picture on the right is often cited as "proof" the car's windshield was damaged. But do these pictures show the same car? Are their colors identical? How do the two backgrounds compare? Are there any bullet holes in the windshield of the vehicle on the left? Was the arrest of the "rag doll" by two "heroic" police officers (partly obscured by a censor's airbrush in this picture) just part of the "training exercise" — until the exercise "went live"? Not a drop of blood to be seen on any of the victims taken to hospitalThere are two things to be noted in the above picure: (1) This man is not being loaded into the ambulance at the entrance to the mosque, or even at the entrance to the mosque compound, but at the entrance to the alley — where the "body" of Ansi Alibava formerly lay. And incredibly, (2) They have somehow managed to work Ansi's sneakers into the frame (see bottom left). On the face of things, this doesn't make any sense. But it must, for some inscrutable reason, have suited their purposes. Judging from the wall and the pillar in the background, this photograph was taken close to Palazzo Lane — on the same side of Deans Avenue, but about 20 metres in the opposite direction. Click here for more pictures of "casualties". Right and center: Temel Ataçocuğu points to where he was hit by a bullet......and, left, what would have happened to Temel if he had really been hit by a bullet. (Suicide attempt with a service rifle.) "On March 15, 2019, Temel Ataçocuğu was praying in the Al Noor Mosque in Christ- • At 6:56, the "gunman" reaches the threshold of the prayer hall. At this point, according to Temel's testimony, we should see Temel kneeling directly in front of the "gunman" and turning to "lock eyes" with him. In reality, we see (1) a "body" to the left, already lying face-down, and (2) an indeterminate black shape to the right. Both are motionless. And remarkably, there is no one in the area in front of the mihrab (the niche that indicates the Qibla).
|
Is this a deadly weapon or just a 'noise-making stick'?"Noise-making stick" is the description of Jim Fetzer — one of the many knowledgeable people (mainly Americans) who have analyzed the "shooting" in and around Al Noor Mosque and concluded that the "weapon" is actually a replica airgun of a type readily available in the United States. Such guns, which are manufactured to look and feel like real firearms, are powered by a cartridge of CO2 that fits neatly into the stock (see below), and shoot blanks, bbs (metallic spherical projectiles) and pellets. Because these are much cheaper than live rounds, replica airguns "are often used in place of their live-fire counterparts for ease of training and extra target practice" (Airgun Depot). The dealer adds: "It is often hard to tell the difference between the live-fire version and the replica gun. The markings, weight, and action are often identical." — In New Zealand, there has been much agonizing over the fact alleged gunman Brenton Tarrant was granted a firearms licence in November 2017 without being subjected to the usual regulatory regime. However, this fact is not necessarily germane to the events of March 15, 2019. In other words, the shooter's possession of a firearms licence did not determine the nature of the equipment he deployed at Al Noor Mosque, and could be no more than a decoy topic to keep official investigators of the case preoccupied. For more information on the AR-15 and the effect its (live-fire) bullets have on the body, go to the dedicated page. |
Evidence of Masonic/occult influence in the 'shootings' The fish and the number 14, displayed above on the palms of John Podesta, both appear on the weapon shown in the previous section of this presentation. Podesta, a "swamp creature" who was Hillary Clinton's campaign manager in 2016, was in New Zealand on March 10, 2019, for a Global Progressives Event, and stayed until the day before the alleged shootings. While in the country, he warned that New Zealand was a "juicy target" for a major hack. — The wording on the image is not mine. The De-Occulting of John Podesta has further information.
|
Could 'Tarrant' have driven to Linwood in the time frame? The short answer to the above question — from Christchurch residents, at any rate — appears to be "no" — despite claims to the contrary in the legacy media. The NZ Herald, for instance, has the "gunman" completing the trip in only six minutes, between 1.46pm and 1.52pm. According to the Herald, he then spends only three minutes shooting up Linwood Islamic Center and dodging Abdul Aziz's eftpos machine. The other timeline issue: Apparently premature reports in the news media• Reminiscent of the BBC's premature announcement of the collapse of Building 7 on 9/11 were several news reports of the Christchurch "terror attacks" a day or more before the actual events. When I republished the tweet on the left on a previous version of this page, and pointed out that no shooting was reported before 1.40pm on March 15, 2019, "FTGBS" responded by reposting the tweet on the right on Twitter/X and suggesting the timeline on the left was either faked or generated by a different time zone. (Time and date styles differ.) • See also "Christchurch terrorist discussed attacks online a year before carrying them out, new research reveals", from The Conversation of February 20, 2024. — I don't know whether these postings fall into the category of "predictive programming", which would make them the work of the organizers of the Christchurch event, or whether "Tarrant" is the author of some, or all, of them. |
Drama Part 2: Slapstick terror comes to Loony LinwoodAbove: In one of the iconic photographs of March 15, Linwood Islamic Center imam Alabi Lateef Zirullah, a Nigerian, emerges from the center with melodramatic "bloodstains" covering his white robe. Meanwhile, his accomplice, whom I have dubbed Raspberry Juice Man, carries a half-empty bottle of a red liquid, and appears shocked to see a camera pointed at him — as well he might.
Linwood hero's tall tale ends with his arrest in a nearby supermarket carpark
Abdul Aziz, the "hero" who reportedly hurled an eftpos machine at the "gunman", says he (Aziz) was later ar- |
Why did the Muslims desecrate their places of worship?Excerpts from an interview with Robert David Steele, a former Marine Corps infantry officer and CIA spy who regularly answers questions for the Tehran Times.Q. The attack on a mosque in New Zealand by an alleged white supremacist appears to have many questionable aspects. In broad terms, what do you think happened?
My guess is that, initially, the Muslims were asked to participate in the police mass-casualty training exercise, and that, when the exercise "went live", they were no longer able to back out. Now they are trapped in a lie that is "too big to fail", since the credibility of all concerned, including the nation, is at stake. That's why both they and the authorities ignore the issues, base their case entirely on the emotional testimonies of "survivors" and "rescuers", and dismiss any challenges to the official narrative as "conspiracy theories". In this way, with the connivance of a complicit media, an amateurish smoke-and-mirrors show is able to masquerade as reality. |
Diary of events that followed the arrest of the suspectMarch 26, 2019: The Government announces a royal commission of inquiry into the "Christchurch terror attacks", and promises that it will "leave no stone unturned" in its attempt to "get to the bottom of how the terrorism occurred". See here.
|
Footnote: The witch hunt is on: See "Christchurch mosque attack: Up to 14 years' jail for video sharers as Commissioner asks Facebook to give police names" at nzherald.co.nz. The article by Chris Keall, dated March 19, 2019, begins: "Chief Censor David Shanks has officially classified the full 17-minute video of the fatal Christchurch shootings which occurred on Friday 15 March, as 'objectionable' — meaning it is banned. That raises the prospect of a fine of up to $10,000 or up to 14 years' jail for anyone who shares the clip — and this morning, Privacy Commissioner John Edwards called on Facebook to share names with police. It is an offence to share this material as soon as it is produced, and the timing of the official classification does not affect the ability of police and enforcement agencies to prosecute offences under the Films, Videos & Publications Classification Act 1993, Shanks says. "Facebook should be notifying the police of the account names of people who have shared this content," Edwards told RNZ this morning. "It's not a conflict I think because at the core there is a very egregious offence to the dignity and the rights to privacy of the victims." Actually, you would hard-pressed to identify anyone in the video. Those who have viewed it say all the "bodies" are (conveniently?) face-down. Meanwhile, one wonders why viewing the film of the Kennedy assassination is not a "very egregious offence to the dignity and the right to privacy of the late president". It is hard to escape the conclusion that the elite, in this case, are (a) trying to hide something, and (b) trying to infantalize and criminalize the entire population, to lock us all into a state of ignorance, subservience and fear. This is the new feudalism, which surveillance technology will make more sinister than the last. See the Philip Arps case. Return to top of page Go to next page
|
Above left: Counter active since May 10, 2019. Right: Counter active since October 13, 2019